perceived privileges of being the son of a wealthy oilman. “Doubtless you have been the subject of parental indulgence,” he began. “You have had pleasures and conveniences which many your age do not have. You should have had some privations and hardships to make you strong. Perhaps if things in general had not been so easy, it would be different.” He then fined the boy seventy-five dollars and expressed his desire that it should be deducted from his Christmas allowance. In contrast, the Tulsa Tribune noted that the madam of a brothel was fined fourteen dollars plus court costs that same day. Padon was also arrested and fined fifty dollars for his part. The two girls who were with them that night were never charged. Ironically, it was one of them who had shot out the light nearest to Gorrell’s Ford after Padon had taken a shot and missed. Outside the courtroom, Wilcox Senior took offense to the judge’s criticism of his parenting and how newspapers and city leaders were shaping the story into a cautionary tale of rich kids gone wrong. “The amount of money given my children as spending change is so small that I would not name it for fear friends would think it untrue. The children of financially well-off families are wild, in a way, but no wilder than those in less fortunate circumstances. And it is only the prominence of the parents that has brought both stories to the front pages of the nation’s press. “Youths of families living in my neighborhood and who are schoolmates of my son do not have large sums of money to spend, according to their fathers with whom I have talked. I believe my own family is an average one and I know that Junior does not have too much money to spend,” Senior said as he adjusted his fedora in preparation to leave. “One does not have to have money to get into trouble. Lack of it is the usual cause for crime. Daily check of the newspaper and courts will show that.” But Wilcox’s statement was never given much consideration. For average folks in town, it was easy to cast blame on the shortcomings of all the mothers and fathers of Tulsa’s privileged youth. After all, the names of kids from regular families weren’t being dragged through the newspaper mud—it was those high-society types. Hours after the news of Born’s death had spread throughout Tulsa, Mayor Truman Penney made a rare Sunday evening appearance at the police station. “The parents are to blame at bottom for this shocking revelation of what our children have been doing,” Mayor Penney dramatically declared to a World reporter. “While the parents give their time to making money (this left no doubt which parents he meant), the children go about ungoverned. I am greatly disturbed and saddened by what happened today and by what has happened in the last two weeks. It has got to the point where I don’t know what to do next.” But he did know what he was going to do next. In a meeting of city commissioners led by Oscar Hoop on Tuesday, December 11, city leaders swore to go after the one element which they believed was corrupting Tulsa’s youth the most: marble machines—the grandfather of the pinball machine. “Marble machines and loitering of young people around them have provided much of the background for events that tie into the death investigation,” the Tribune claimed in a front-page article. However, the precise correlation between marble machines and murder was never actually explained. “Reverberations of the Gorrell murder case were felt in the city commission meeting Tuesday [December 11] as Police Commissioner Hoop announced that marble machine distributors would either clean house or the police would do it for them,” the Tribune continued. Hoop’s proposal was to clear the machines from establishments located near the schools, and to establish the city’s complete control over them through licensure. But as Hoop later confessed in that same meeting, he didn’t want to just